A recent lawsuit filed in federal court seeks to change Minnesota’s accommodating laws granting access to abortion. The lawsuit was brought by a group of plaintiffs, including women who say they had non-voluntary abortions, anti-abortion organizations, and crisis pregnancy centers. The plaintiffs argue that Minnesota’s abortion consent process is too loose and that its legal protections for medical providers are too lenient.
Attorney Harold Cassidy, who has brought lawsuits on behalf of people who regretted having abortions, is representing the plaintiffs. He claims Minnesota is violating the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment by illegally terminating parental rights through involuntary and unwanted abortions. The lawsuit names several defendants, including Planned Parenthood.
Despite the lawsuit, lawmakers and advocates in Minnesota remain supportive of reproductive freedom. Some legislators are anticipating a big fight on the issue, but are confident in their stance on allowing Minnesotans to make healthcare decisions without interference. Experts believe the lawsuit is unlikely to prevail, but may signify a trend in future attempts to challenge abortion rights.
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has responded to the lawsuit, stating that he does not believe it has merit. Reproductive rights advocates also find the legal arguments presented by the plaintiffs to be convoluted. Overall, the lawsuit represents a potential challenge to existing abortion laws in Minnesota, but faces significant legal and political hurdles.
Source
Photo credit www.mprnews.org
