In 2017, President Donald Trump issued an executive order banning travel from Muslim-majority countries, leading to legal challenges and Supreme Court involvement. If re-elected, Trump plans to end birthright citizenship by executive order, arguing that children born in the U.S. to parents without legal status should not automatically become citizens. This proposal directly contradicts the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. and under its jurisdiction.
Legal experts, including conservatives, generally agree that birthright citizenship is constitutional and should include children of undocumented immigrants. If implemented, Trump’s plan would likely face legal challenges similar to the travel ban case. The proposal is not included in the 2024 Republican platform, but it aligns with the party’s stance on immigration reform.
Critics of birthright citizenship argue that children of undocumented immigrants should not automatically become citizens, based on the 14th Amendment’s language. However, historical precedent and legal interpretations suggest otherwise. Trump’s proposed executive order would require proof of parental immigration status for newborns to receive Social Security numbers and passports, highlighting the challenges of implementation.
This controversial policy change could have immediate and long-lasting effects, sparking widespread legal battles and potentially leading to a Supreme Court decision. Despite support from some anti-immigration advocates, many experts view Trump’s plan as unconstitutional and unrealistic. The battle over birthright citizenship reflects larger debates on immigration policy, citizenship rights, and constitutional interpretation in the United States.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com