The US Supreme Court has rejected a request from ExxonMobil Corp and Koch Industries Inc to review a lower court ruling that allowed a state court in Massachusetts to hear a lawsuit accusing the companies of misleading consumers about climate change. The decision means that the case will proceed in state court rather than federal court, a blow to the oil giants who sought to have the case dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.
The lawsuit, brought by the Massachusetts attorney general, alleges that Exxon and Koch deceived consumers by downplaying the risks of climate change and promoting fossil fuels despite knowing about their harmful effects on the environment. The companies argued that the case should be heard in federal court, where they believe they would have a better chance of success.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the appeal is a significant development in the ongoing legal battle over climate change accountability. It sends a signal that state courts are a viable venue for holding corporations accountable for their role in contributing to climate change. The decision is also a setback for Exxon and Koch, who now must defend themselves in a potentially hostile state court.
Environmental activists and climate advocates have hailed the Supreme Court’s decision as a victory for accountability and transparency in the fossil fuel industry. They hope that the lawsuit will set a precedent for future cases holding corporations responsible for their environmental impact. The case could have far-reaching implications for the oil and gas industry, which is facing increasing pressure to address its role in exacerbating climate change.
Overall, the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the appeal is a significant development in the fight against climate change and corporate accountability. The lawsuit against Exxon and Koch will now proceed in state court, potentially setting a precedent for future legal actions against companies that contribute to climate change.
Source
Photo credit www.reuters.com
