Hezbollah’s approach to containing, rather than ending, its conflict with Israel is causing a divide in Lebanon, reminiscent of the civil war from 1975-1990. Critics blame Hezbollah for initiating conflict without consulting other factions and worsening Lebanon’s already devastated economy. As tensions rise with Israel threatening all-out war, some Lebanese Christians, led by politicians like Samir Gagea and Samy Gemayel, oppose Hezbollah’s actions, fearing drawn-out conflict and Israeli attacks on Lebanese soil.
On the other hand, some view Hezbollah as a grassroots resistance group that liberated south Lebanon from Israeli occupation in 2000. The group, backed by Iran, has expanded its capabilities and revenue streams, positioning itself as part of the “axis of resistance” against Israel. However, critics argue that Hezbollah’s decision to engage with Israel unilaterally could lead to further instability and conflict.
While some pro-Hezbollah supporters call for more aggressive action against Israel, others fear the consequences of a full-scale war, which could lead to mass displacement and potential civil strife among Lebanon’s diverse population. Despite the varying views on Hezbollah’s actions, many in Lebanon are wary of getting drawn into a regional conflict and exacerbating sectarian tensions that could benefit Israel. Ultimately, the fragile balance between resistance and stability in Lebanon hinges on Hezbollah’s strategic decisions and the response of the Lebanese political class in navigating a potential conflict with Israel.
Source
Photo credit www.aljazeera.com